The Terminator Technology
On the 3rd of the March
1998 The US Department of Agriculture and cotton seed breeders Delta and Pine
Land Company acquired US patent 5,723,765 for their "Technology Protection
System" (TPS). This system for genetically engineering a suicide mechanism
into seeds of the next generation was dubbed the "terminator"
technology.. On May 11th Monsanto announced its intention of buying
Delta and Pine Land Co. for $1.76 billion. This was widely seen as a move to
gain the terminator patent.
This technology offers no benefit
for farmers or consumers. The only advantage would be to commercial seed
companies hoping to force farmers back to market each season to purchase
seeds.70% of the worlds farmers, mostly in the south, are reliant upon farm-saved
seed. The potential threat to small farmers has caused widespread outrage and
protests. Indian farmers who uprooted and burned Monsanto's GE cotton test
plots were fuelled by their anger about the terminator, even though these were
not themselves terminator crops. There are 100 million farmers in India and 80%
are dependent on farm-saved seed. In December 1998 the Indian Agricultural
Minister Som Pal was forced to assure the Upper House that terminator would not
be allowed in India.
On September 15th 1998
Astra Zeneca received US patent 5,808,034 on its own terminator type
technology. This was branded the "verminator" as the genes were taken
from brown rats. All five companies developing GE seeds have now applied for
their own terminator style patents. In November of 1998 The Consultative Group
on International Agricultural Research (CGIAR), the world network of publicly
funded plant breeding research centres announced that none of its centres would
develop "any genetic system designed to prevent germination".
In April 1999 Monsanto announced the
postponement of the commercialisation of the terminator pending an independent
review. Astra-Zeneca followed in May announcing it would not develop
"technology which results in sterility in second generation seed".
For the time being the tide seems to be turning against the terminator. If
these companies are allowed to go ahead with commercialisation of this
technology, the profit potential of the terminator trait dictate it would soon
be included in all GE crops.
Switchable promoters
The willingness of Astra-Zeneca to
abandon the terminator may have something to do with its interest in
genetically engineering plants whose traits are controlled by a
"switchable promoter". This system allows traits to be switched on or
off by application of a chemical catalyst. Sterility is just one of the traits
which could be under the control of such promoters. Astra-Zeneca have at least
seven patent applications on different promoter systems.
This technology could be used to
create plants whose desirable traits would be switched on only by the
application of a chemical. Farmers will have to buy seed and the chemical that
goes with it. What could be more logical for companies than to put the required
chemical in its own herbicide or pesticide?
Astra-Zeneca's patent WO 973983
covers a system which creates GE plants that require continuous exposure to a
chemical for germination and healthy growth. GE companies aim to enforce the
link between seeds and chemicals and extract further costs from farmers.
GE companies will be able to produce
seed that contains multiple GE traits, farmers will have to pay for the
chemical to activate each specific trait. RAFI who originally coined the name
terminator call this "traitor technology".
Apomictic seed
Apomixis is a naturally occurring
form of asexual reproduction in which plant embryos grow from egg cells without
fertilisation by pollen. Genetic engineers have transferred the genes
conferring apomixis from a wild grass species into maize. By using GE apomixis
breeders could dramatically reduce the high cost of producing hybrid seed.
The combination of switchable
promoters with apomixis enables the creation of seed that would produce viable
plants that would grow and produce viable seed only when treated with
chemicals. Rather than the annual cost of producing hybrid seed, the GE giants
would simply need to produce the seed once, and then extract the costs from
farmers through the chemicals to switch on the traits, including the apomictic
trait, each season.
This would
spell massive profits for the GE companies and their complete control over
non-subsistence agriculture.
No comments:
Post a Comment