Neofunctionalism
Neofunctionalism is a theory of regional integration, building on the
work of Ernst B. Haas, an American
political scientist and also Leon Lindberg, an American
political scientist.
The main
contributions of these authors was an employment of empiricism.
Neofunctionalism describes and explains
the process of regional integration with reference to how three causal factors
interact with one another:
(a) growing
economic interdependence between nations,
(b) organizational
capacity to resolve disputes and build international legal regimes, and
(c) supranational
market rules that replace national regulatory regimes.[2]
Early
Neofunctionalist theory assumed a decline in importance of nationalism
and the nation-state;
It predicted that,
gradually, elected officials, interest groups, and large commercial interests
within states would see it in their interests to pursue welfarist objectives
best satisfied by the political and market integration at a higher,
supranational level.
Haas theorized
three mechanisms that he thought would drive the integration forward:
Positive spillover,
The transfer of
domestic allegiances and
Technocratic
automaticity.
Positive spillover
effect is the notion that integration between states in one economic
sector will create strong incentives for integration in further sectors, in
order to fully capture the perks of integration in the sector in which it
started.
Increased number of transactions
and intensity of negotiations then takes place hand in hand with increasing
regional integration. This leads to a creation of institutions that work
without reference to "local" governments.
The mechanism of a transfer in domestic allegiances
can be best understood by first noting that an important assumption within
neofunctionalist thinking is of a pluralistic society within the relevant
nation states.
Neofunctionalists claim that, as the process of
integration gathers pace, interest groups and associations within the
pluralistic societies of the individual nation states will transfer their
allegiance away from national institutions towards the supranational European
institutions.
Greater regulatory complexity is then needed
and other institutions on regional level are usually called for. This causes
integration to be transferred to higher levels of decision-making processes.
Technocratic automaticity described the way in
which, as integration proceeds, the supranational institutions set up to oversee
that integration process will themselves take the lead in sponsoring further
integration as they become more powerful and more autonomous of the member
states. In the Haas-Schmitter model, size of unit, rate of transactions,
pluralism, and elite complementarity are the background conditions on which the
process of integration depends.
political integration will then become an "inevitable"
side effect of integration in economic sectors.
Intergovernmentalism is an alternative
theory of political integration, where power in international organizations is
possessed by the member-states and decisions are made by unanimity.
Neofunctionalists
have attacked Intergovernmentalism on theoretical grounds, and on the basis of
empirical evidence which they claim show that Intergovernmentalism is incapable
of explaining the dynamics and overall trajectory of European integration. [7]