BIOLOGICAL WARFARE
Biological warfare (also known as germ
warfare) is the use of biological toxins or
infectious agents
such as bacteria, viruses, and fungi with intent to kill or incapacitate
humans, animals or plants as an act of war.
Biological weapons may be employed in various ways to gain a
strategic or tactical
advantage over an adversary, either by threats or by actual deployments.
These agents may be lethal or non-lethal,
and may be targeted against a single individual, a group of people, or even an
entire population.
As a tactical weapon for military use, a significant problem
with a biological warfare attack is that it would take days to be effective,
and therefore might not immediately stop an opposing force.
Some biological agents (especially smallpox, plague,
and tularemia)
have the capability of person-to-person transmission via aerosolized respiratory droplets. This feature can be undesirable,
as the agent(s) may be transmitted by this mechanism to unintended populations,
including neutral or even friendly forces.
While containment of biological warfare transmission is less
of a concern for certain criminal or terrorist organizations, it remains a
significant concern for the military and civilian populations of virtually all
nations.
History
During the 6th century BC, the Assyrians
poisoned enemy wells with a fungus that would render the enemy delirious.
In 184 BC, Hannibal of Carthage
had clay pots filled with venomous snakes
and instructed his soldiers to throw the pots onto the decks of Pergamene
ships.
Historical accounts from medieval Europe detail the use of
infected animal carcasses, by Mongols, Turks and other groups, to infect enemy
water supplies. Prior to the bubonic plague
epidemic known as the Black
Death.
Mongol
and Turkish
armies were reported to have catapulted disease-laden corpses into besieged
cities.
The last known incident of using plague corpses for
biological warfare purposes occurred in 1710, when Russian forces attacked the Swedes by flinging plague-infected
corpses over the city walls of Reval.
The British army at
least once attempted to use smallpox as
a weapon, when they gave contaminated
blankets to the Lenape
during Pontiac's
War (1763–66).
During the Sino-Japanese War (1937–1945)
and World War II (1939–1945), the Special Research Units of the Imperial Japanese Army, such as Unit 731,
conducted human experimentation on thousands of Chinese,
among others.
In its military campaigns, the Japanese used biological
warfare on Chinese soldiers and civilians.
Firsthand accounts testify that the Japanese infected
civilians through the distribution of plagued foodstuffs and newer estimates
suggest over 580,000 victims, largely due to plague and cholera outbreaks.
In response to suspected biological warfare development in Nazi Germany,
the U.S., U.K., and Canada initiated a biological warfare development program
in 1941 that resulted in the weaponization of anthrax, brucellosis,
and botulism
toxin.
Research carried out in the U.K. during World War II left Gruinard Island in
Scotland contaminated with anthrax for the next 48 years.
Offensive
The argument is that biological weapons cannot be
controlled: the weapon could backfire and harm the army on the offensive,
perhaps having even worse effects than on the target.
An agent like smallpox or other airborne viruses would
almost certainly spread worldwide and ultimately infect the user's home
country.
Ideal characteristics of a biological agent to be used as a
weapon against humans are high infectivity,
high virulence,
non-availability of vaccines,
and availability of an effective and efficient delivery system.
Anti-agriculture
bombs for delivery to enemy watersheds in agricultural
regions to initiate epiphytotics (epidemics among plants).
Agents
considered for weaponization, or known to be weaponized, include bacteria such
as
bacteria
Bacillus
anthracis,
Vibrio
cholerae, and
Many
viral
agents have been studied and/or weaponized, including some of the
Variola
virus, and
"Yellow Rain"
Toxins
Toxins
that can be used as weapons include
saxitoxin,
and
The tests were designed to cover “not only trials at sea,
but Arctic and tropical environmental tests as well.”
The tests, presumably, were conducted at what research
officers designated, but did not name, “satellite sites.”
The tests conducted there were aimed at both human, animal,
and plant reaction to BW.
It is known that
tests were undertaken in Cairo, Egypt, Liberia,
in South
Korea, and in Japan’s satellite province of Okinawa in
1961, or earlier.(Harris, 2002)[17]
Anti-livestock:
In 1980s Soviet Ministry of Agriculture had successfully developed variants of
In 1980s Soviet Ministry of Agriculture had successfully developed variants of
rinderpest
against cows,
African swine fever for pigs, and
psittacosis to
kill chicken.
These
agents were prepared to spray them down from tanks attached to airplanes over
hundreds of miles. The secret program was code-named "Ecology".
Entomological warfare
Entomological warfare (EW) is a type of biological warfare
that uses insects to attack the enemy.
The concept has existed for centuries and research and
development have continued into the modern era.
Essentially, EW exists in three varieties.
One type of EW involves infecting insects with a pathogen
and then dispersing the insects over target areas. The insects then act as a vector, infecting any person or animal
they might bite.
Another type of EW is a direct insect attack against crops;
the insect may not be infected with any pathogen but instead represents a
threat to agriculture.
The final method uses uninfected insects, such as bees,
wasps, etc., to directly attack the enemy.
Synthetic biological warfare
- Would demonstrate how to render a vaccine ineffective;
- Would confer resistance to therapeutically useful antibiotics or antiviral agents;
- Would enhance the virulence of a pathogen or render a nonpathogen virulent;
- Would increase transmissibility of a pathogen;
- Would alter the host range of a pathogen;
- Would enable the evasion of diagnostic/detection tools;
- Would enable the weaponization of a biological agent or toxin
No comments:
Post a Comment